Review: Happy Endings?
Written by Angela Mac   
Monday, 02 March 2009 16:18

After watching Tara Hurley’s rousing documentary, Happy Endings?, I feel like stomping on to the front lawn of Providence’s City Hall, and burning my bra. Sure, the sight of freshly-sprung, creamy white breasts might scare the gay man inside – but if Happy Endings is any indication, it’d serve him right.
The fruit of Hurley’s twenty-eight month odyssey is focused upon Rhode Island’s unusual prostitution law: outdoor prostitution, solicitation and the like are outlawed. Indoor prostitution remains unaddressed in RI legislation (stemming from an 80's court case).

Here’s where the first few sticks are thrown onto the pyre. The ACLU and defense lawyers maintain indoor prostitution is, quite simply, not against the law – while more conservative minds cry, “Loophole!”

Semantics. Is it important, though? As with so much of what she lies on the table, Hurley leaves it to the viewer to decide. Paramount or ridiculous, this is what is going on.


Rather than walk the streets, ladies of the night found their way into Providence massage parlors. It is legal, afterall. Hurley’s cameras bring us the aftermath of this decision to take advantage of a safer, and by all accounts cleaner, means of servicing johns. The rise of salacious parlor advertisements among the back pages of The Providence Phoenix provided an easy route for politicians to flex their ethics and police to wallow in muscle. When Hurley’s interviews unveil a story of three regulars to one particular spa, who turned out to be undercover cops, she doesn’t ask us if it is a waste of taxpayers’ dollars. However, they were regulars for two months. When I pay the local 911 and Road Patrol millage, you can bet your sandalwood oil it isn’t to provide our badged finest with unlimited hand jobs. The only way to keep the peace in Providence is for local officers to run a city tab on oral sex?

Behold: The face of immorality Reps are keeping out of their back yards.


At first, giving the parlors a rough time wasn’t difficult. If a business advertises licensed massages, there had better be some frames with signatures on the wall. So, the police busted, and the ladies opted for “Body Rub” lingo – making future busts more problematic. Beyond licenses, there is any number of trumped up building violations to light upon. It’s difficult, indeed, to watch footage of tiny Asian women bemoaning arrests and fines for violating fire safety standards…… in RHODE ISLAND. Routinely, in these memories of crazed busts, where ten to fifteen police brute squad their way in, and order everyone out, there is mention of “a couple of customers” being present. It doesn’t take a Great White fan to vividly recall Rhode Island’s blatant lack of fire safety inspections at a club which frequently housed hundreds of people. I guess if that club owner had been a 5’4” busty Asian chick in a bikini, the local law enforcement might have been considerably more interested.

As a woman, I don’t feel prostitution needs to be defended. If I choose to sell my body for actual dollars, rather than dinner and diamonds, it is my business. Calling it the “oldest profession” diminishes the reality – women have forever sold their piece of tail. Far predating Lysistrata, women in caves, without a doubt, would experience a craving for venison over rabbit, and cunningly ensnare their man to get them what they wanted in exchange for pleasantries later on. Men, to their credit, were happy to make the trade. When, exactly, is the definition of prostitution muted? If he’s a husband, and it’s a sparkly tennis bracelet? If he’s a mechanic and I need a new transmission? I don’t think it was strategic planning on Hurley’s part that the women most outspoken against prostitution in the film were, incidentally, not the sort of women likely to be able to charge.

In among the wealth of facts and experiences presented, one can piece together the crux of the politicians’ problem: saying, “Prostitution is BAD” isn’t a convincing argument. However, saying, “human trafficking is bad”… well, that carries weight. Representative Joanne Giannini is quick to burnish the flag, along with many politicians and police who feed the media their sole concern that evil pimps are plucking unwitting Korean girls from their impoverished lives, and forcing them to work off their pass to America, with their very bodies.

Lady after lady sits down before Hurley’s camera and shrugs off the allegation. “No. No slaves.” “I have two sons.” “I have a nice car, a nice house.” One woman is putting her son through law school. Hurley asks if drugs are involved, and a woman shakes her head incredulously, “What? No.” Then she inquires if there’s any gambling – given the close proximity of casinos. It’s met with a self-aware laugh, “Oooh… yeah… there is gambling.” Hurley doesn’t say it, but we get it: enslaved women don’t have five grand to lose at the casino.

“So, you might speak to one or two girls who aren’t enslaved. That’s good. Good for them,” says the Mayor. What are the odds? At a NCJW convention, we’re provided with more facts, “seventy-five to a hundred prostitutes working in the parlors right now.” The speaker goes on to assert these women don’t go home, don’t have lives… but… we just spent an hour hearing from umpteen girls, who vouched for all the women they’d met while working within the RI adult spa industry, we heard from two different owners of spas – they all went home, they all had lives. None were enslaved.

In 2006, 109 women were sentenced to an average of ninety days, while only two men were incarcerated, stemming from the busts of parlors. If what the Gianninis of Rhode Island say is true, then why aren’t more johns apprehended? Why are so many women incarcerated, if they represent the victims the politicians are purporting to protect?

Some women think they're entitled to renting themselves out. Joanna Giannini disagrees. Wonder why...


Why did the police bust a spa, press the women to the walls, squeeze the cuffs down to a throbbing pinch – answer questions such as, “What is going on?” with “SHUT UP!” -- and march the women, wearing only bikinis, out… in the dead of winter? Liberation? Really?

I hope all viewers will hit the rewind button when Joanne Giannini details an enlightening visit to a beauty parlor: a beautician was talking about some Korean girls who were working at a spa, and how much money the Korean girls were spending. Giannini then goes on to recall how the beautician (“who didn’t even know what was going on”) told of how the girls were working off their passage to the US, were forced to work in the parlors, etc. Hurley is so, refreshingly, confident in her message that she doesn’t pause the film with a blackboard of, “Well, which is it, Joanne? Are they dropping dough, or are they slaves? Pick a side, lady.” Yet, she inspires us to fill in the blanks.

Tara Hurley takes a gamble with Happy Endings – she’s careful not to force feed, merely presenting facts from both sides of the line. Sure, it’s a stacked deck, but that’s not Hurley’s fault. These women aren’t hurting anyone, nor are they even soliciting anyone – unlike some of the legislators presented, who wave their oppressive bills in the face of anyone looking in their direction. Not all of the spa inhabitants shown are easy on the eyes, either. The male co-owner of one is an oddly shaped, chain-smoking, chipped tooth, likable fellow, though thoroughly seedy in appearance – but his allegations of snowjobs in the media are fully corroborated by the smart looking female ad manager of The Providence Phoenix. A brilliant play by Hurley, and even though she never shouts what she is saying, we get it.

The editing, in parts, might smack of function discovery in a computer editing suite, but the material was painstakingly collected. Crushing honesty more than compensates for the portions of faces we don’t see. In the end, I truly hope Hurley is already tinkering away on her next expose. She has a brain, and a heart – two elements this nation sorely needs behind its cameras.

 

For more on Happy Endings? please visit: http://www.happyendingsdocumentary.com


Contact Angela Mac: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

 

Comments
Add New Search
+/-
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
:!::?::idea::arrow:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
Bobby B  - The Real Deal   |76.115.19.xxx |2009-03-02 12:18:03
Wow. I don't consider myself a feminist. I don't think you have to be to
recognize that everybody should have full rights over there own body to do with
as they please as long as it doesn't hurt anybody else. The ridiculous nature of
our cultures hypocrisy towards prostitution is only at its most
Alice-in-Wonderland obvious with the anecdote about the policemen doing
"undercover" work. All in the line of duty.

Joanna Giannini feels
differently...is she given a forum to explain why? Is she a fundamentalist of
some sort? Does she see the prostitution of these massage parlor as an affront
to feminism because no matter where it happens it demeans women everywhere?
What's her take, did you find it valid at all, and what would you say to her if
you had the chance?

Is this Hurley's only documentary?
Bobby B  - PS   |76.115.19.xxx |2009-03-02 13:45:13
The review, of course, had your usual fluid style and extremely active intellect
and that's always appreciated. But I really wanted to thank you for taking
picking a side with this movie. You didn't beat us over the head but you do have
an opinion about the situation the movie presents and you're not afraid to make
it known and let that inform your review. Sometimes you just have to do what you
can with the tools at hand. A review is never "objective" journalism by
definition. So the unwillingness of a lot of writers to invest an opinion feels
disingenuous. And when you're dealing with a movie with politically inflammatory
subject matter, such avoidance feels like cowardice. Thanks for ever-so-slightly
getting involved.
Angela Mac   |67.142.161.xxx |2009-03-02 16:54:55
With the exception of the working girls presented, other guests in the film
seemed to have been given equal screen time.

Looked up a few
things after watching, but from what I see, beyond saying she doesn't
agree with the idea of prostitution (human entitlement to such), I don't
see where Giannini (or those with the laws in their crosshairs) allows
herself to be boxed in from that angle. It very much comes across as
a "human trafficking" angle. Though she has plenty to say on
that subject, I fail to see the validity. Slavery, kidnapping, extortion --
these things are already outlawed. But certainly she's taken at least a junior high level history
class, so, she knows this. When reading and watching, what I
inevitably walk away with is awareness of an agenda of making human
trafficking synonymous with prostitution. 

So, what would I say? Same
thing I'd say to the pro-lifers:
"Bitch, stay out of
my uterus."

And thank you for the kind comments. As you know, I
rarely experience hesitation in stating my opinion.
joshua the man  - the poor uterus   |216.157.209.xxx |2009-06-26 10:44:51
ya-know A-MAC....YOU write A DARN GOOD ARTICLE...AND APPARENTLY UTERUSES ARE
BEING MISUSED AND MISUNDERSTOOD ALL UP IN PROVIDENCE..WHO KNEW??!...AS A
PERSONAL OBSERVATION,i DON'T LIKE THAT SOME WOMEN CHOOSE TO RENT OUT THEIR
UTERUS WHENEVER THEY CAN'T PAY THE CABLE BILL OR MAX OUT THEIR SEARS CREDIT
CARD...BUT GENERALLY SPEAKING ,A WOMAN SHOULD BE ABLE TO PLUMB THE REWARDS OF
SHARING HER FUNKY THANG WITH ANY MALE UP TO THE CHALLENGE AND CARRYING A BUCKET
-O-MONEY....IT'S THOSE CLEAR CUT CASES OF EXPLOITATION AND BRUTALITY THAT MUCK
UP THE NATURAL REALITY OF THIS ANCIENT AND POPULAR PASSTIME...KUDOS MIZZ angela
mac..your observations are once again right on....
Karl  - every woman's right to sleep under a bridge?   |69.30.78.xxx |2009-10-02 16:03:46
If I choose to sell my body for actual dollars, rather than dinner and
diamonds, it is my business.


Then it begs the question of why, if you don't already have a job that
pays $100 or more an hour, you don't turn to legal prostitution yourself
and cash in? Is there a way you can answer that common sense question
without getting really defensive?

I've never understood
libertarians who sleep in warm beds calling themselves humanitarians
for defending everyone's right, rich or poor, to sleep in boxes under
bridges if they want to.
Angela Mac   |67.142.161.xxx |2009-10-27 23:10:29
Then it begs the question of why, if you don't already have a job
that
pays $100 or more an hour, you don't turn to legal
prostitution yourself
and cash in? Is there a way you can answer that
common sense question
without getting really defensive?


In response to your query: I do not rent myself out because... well...
because I'm kinda chubby -- and everyone knows, it's the
very well-shaped prostitutes who get the big bucks. 

It should also
be noted that pandering to men, pretending to be oblivious to their
personality, measurement and lack of creativity (in person), all take
an enormous amount of forbearance. A successful hooker, then, must wield
the patience of a saint -- and I'm afraid it would take more than $100
to transmute my patience deficiency into the surplus required. (I can
provide references on this matter, if necessary.)

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

Last Updated ( Monday, 02 March 2009 16:52 )
 

Banner
Banner
Netflix, Inc.