Celluloid Catharsis column by Angela Mac
Celluloid Catharsis Column: Will Believe for Food
Written by Angela Mac   
Thursday, 04 September 2008 23:57
Article Index
Celluloid Catharsis Column: Will Believe for Food
2
All Pages

WILL BELIEVE FOR FOOD

“… a million miles beyond what science understands.” David Gray

Sometimes flaws can be weightless.

When Dr. Sam Beckett stepped into the quantum leap accelerator, we weren’t burdened with the question of why his handsome body was encased in white spandex. We didn’t sneer in armchair-Mensa disdain at the thought of synthetic fibers not fouling up a genetics-heavy leap of technology. No. Our minds were much too giddy with the delicious wonder of where Dr. Beckett would find himself, who he would become – and how, exactly, an unwittingly wayward soul might benefit from being temporarily replaced by an immaculately directed supergenius.

… white spandex, we can look past – but Tribbles? Not a chance.

Theatre functions upon an idea of Suspension of Disbelief: it’s not simply a period fashion correct actress pretending to be batty – it’s a beleaguered woman who, truly, cannot wipe the blood from her hands. It is what separates a good audience member from a bad; one who takes a seat, fully willing to be transported, is a necessary addition to any performance, be it film, writing or the stage.

Sometimes, it goes off without a hitch. Galaxies far, far away have been presented with little resistance. Other times… well, enormously entertaining as Mel Gibson’s faux swearing, and Joaquin Phoenix in a tin foil hat might be, the last locale in the universe water-prone aliens would infest, is this little blue marble of ours (Signs).

Even then, though, I was willing. Oh, why did it have to be water, Shyamalan? Why not Hawaiian Punch, or canned cola? It burns me that such an engaging story was tailored into a shabby dressing – but I’d be game to see it again, even if I would emit audible grumbling over what, in some circles, has come to be officially known as “The Water Thing”.

… which makes me considerably more lenient than many a cinematic addict.

 

Hella H2O.

When the man comes around, after being frozen for 29 years. (Late for Dinner)

This willingness to wholeheartedly dive into whatever the screen presents is also an obstacle in recommending films to casual filmgoers. For instance, how many films featuring a cryogenics plotline (and not starring Sylvester Stallone) have flown with the masses? Late for Dinner, my feel good film of choice, is routinely panned by those I subject to a viewing. In the film, two friends are, quite literally, put on ice, zipped into bags and housed in industrial-sized barrels for thirty years. Turns out, that’s a tough pill for some of the visitors to my living room to swallow, while I happily down the bottle. So happily, in fact, I never anticipated other viewers not “buying” it.

I mean, who isn’t fond of Tom Cruise’s admirable turn as an innocent forest-dweller in the mystical foray, Legend? The benevolent lad must thwart a horned, cloven monstrosity to extricate his love from the clutches of evil. Audiences have problem with that. However, cryogenics – a legitimate, though problematic, arm of science – rings as too far-fetched.

Escapism!

It would seem that’s why Harry Potter flies, but Timur Bekmambetov’s Nightwatch didn’t. People don’t have to actually choose between being an obedient boy or turning their insufferable aunt into a helium balloon – but (as the beginning of Nightwatch details), one would have to execute a Herculean amount of restraint to not contact an advertised Voodoo Mamma over a girlfriend’s infidelity (check the phone book, if you don’t believe me – but remember, whether her gurgling potions work, or not: Karma’s a bitch).

At some point in our lives, mortality is going to ring the bell of our consciousness, and we’ll have to seriously weigh the pros and cons of burial, cremation, or the deep freeze. Perhaps, in some thin way, “far-fetched” is a straitjacket-less way of saying, “something I’d rather not consider”.

I have no problem considering (of course, I trust Icy Blue wouldn’t be a bad look for me). By the same token, I have no problem with the notion of the man in the apartment down the hall being an assassin (afterall, we’ve all heard stories about the man down the street making a nasty habit of ofting people in the night), the proverbial ax murderer in the woods, or the tooth fairy being an evil incarnate who might be leering, in wait, over my slumbering body one night. A part of my mind doesn’t differentiate: these are all scenarios I may well have to someday confront – better I learn about them before they are sprung upon me.



Comments
Add New Search
+/-
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
:!::?::idea::arrow:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
Chasing Aimee  - This was...   |76.18.197.xxx |2008-09-05 12:22:40
...simply brilliant.

Eloquent and idealistic, intellectual and clearly
stated. Perhaps this is why, in general, I love most movies even when they're
panned by the masses. Often, the ones that the critics hail are the ones I am
bored with (read: There Will Be Blood and No Country for Old Men).

Thanks for
allowing me such great insight into our little way of thinking.
Angela Mac  - Late!   |198.111.220.xxx |2008-09-13 08:45:02
Thank you so much for the kind words.

Every time I've began to
comment back, I am reminded of the GLARING error (the Name, Email, and Title
labels for the fields are swallowed up by the background color). Then, I think,
"oh, I'll correct that!" But then I remember that.. uh... the damned
thing just REFUSES to correct!

REFUSES!!

I'll get it though.
Eventually.

But back to the column... Awesome to see there are more dreamers
afoot! Without believing the "impossible" and being swept up in the
could-be's, all we have are presidential elections and hurricanes (hmm. Suppose
I'm being redundant there).
Angela Mac  - Test   |198.111.220.xxx |2008-09-18 00:24:15
Don't mind me. Just testing.
Midnight Butterfly  - You are beautiful...   |198.111.220.xxx |2008-09-18 08:48:50
...and so is your mind. The job of the filmmaker: execution and commitment. The
job of the audience member: meeting the movie on its own terms. Absolutely. This
basic principle is why say, Cherry 2000 works but Godzilla 2000 does not. And
don't kid yourself, Aimee. The "masses" didn't love There Will Be Blood.
They stayed away in droves. On the other hand they ate up Austin Powers. Sheesh.
Meeting a movie on its own terms and suspending your disbelief is not the same
as letting a movie insult your intelligence.

One thing you never do, Red, is
insult my intelligence. And you make me laugh too. Thanks.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

Last Updated ( Sunday, 21 September 2008 19:28 )
 

Banner
Banner
Netflix, Inc.